2010 World Cup Performance – Italian team

The post is about the shameful exit of the Italian national soccer team from the 2010 World Cup.

From the World Cup champs to the laughing stock of the world.

It’s all “tears” as Azzuri Blue, the World Cup holders, left the stadium and the Italian supporters drifted away from the big screens. Flag and photograph sellers vanished from streets in Italian cities, all due to shame.

One sentiment was dominating headlines on Thursday: La Vergogna, “the shame that followed after being bundled out of the World Cup in one of the easiest groups.”

Azurri suffered a shock 3-2 defeat to Slovakia, leaving them at the bottom of their group after draw with Paraguay and Newzeland.

The Italian national team left in a hest to board the “shame” aircraft which was waiting to fly them home. The Turin daily said ” Italy the world champion leaves South Africa to return home covered in sporting dishonour.”

It is the third time that an always favourable Italian team has exited the competition at the group stage, and the first time it has come to bottom of the group.

The team had no injuries or any other excuse. It is simple, we were champions of the world and now we are the laughing stock of the world.

It is arguably said that Azurri stumbled when they got Lippi back to lead the team. Marcello Lippi, who led the team to the World Cup back in 2006 came out of retirement for the South African tournament.

After a two year spell, doing nothing, obviously Lippi would not have the “vigour and vitality” of building a national side, instead erroneously prefer to preserve and extend the life of the side that lifted the World Cup with him.

Lippi had no room for new hot heads, but it was obvious that the team he fielded against Slovakia showed no sign of team spirit.

World Cup 2010 Sideshows

On the World Cup stage nothing grabbed the camera quite like Diego Maradona. The rest were all reduced to supporting roles

Soccer legend steals the limelight at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa.

On the world cup stage nothing grabbed the camera quite like Diego Maradona. Captain Gabriel Hienze, Juan Sebastian Veron, and even the world player of the year Lionel Messi were all reduced to supporting roles.

My first experience in a World Cup match

It was the World Cup 2010 in South Africa, Cote d’Ivoire vs. Brazil. Time 8.30 pm South African time. 84,500 spectators from all around the world in the soccer city, Johannesburg, and other millions of people watching it live on their TV sets, it was overwhelming.

The atmosphere engulfed me and I could hardly concentrate on the game, other spectators around me must have felt the same as I could see them murmur some words with frowned faces.

The people, the noise from the vuvuzelas, the flashing of the cameras around the stadium, the colour ,the music and the random waves was all too much to take in.

Soccer City is an enormous stadium. Grandeurs in every sense of the word and spectacular in its design. It will be hosting the finals of the World Cup. With its capacity of 90,000 people, it is the biggest in Africa and most glamorous.

Turf and grass test in Algeria tie.

What will not pass unnoticed is the fact that the match between Algeria and Slovenia was the first at a World Cup to be played to be plyed on a surface which is not 100 per cent grass. Fifa decided to test grass mixed with synthetic turf in the Polokwane and the Nelspruit stadiums in South Africa and the teams were relieved to have had the chance to practice on the pitch a day before the match. “It’s brand new turf for us,” said Algerian defender Majid Bougherra.

Car advert denies fans Gerrard goal.

In England, where soccer is the number one sport, fans were really upset when they missed Gerrard goal! The British broadcaster ITV had to apologise to viewers after thousands of England fans missed Steven Gerrard’s opening World Cup goal when a commercial was accidentally aired at the crucial moment. Fans watching ITV’s high definition channel at home and in pubs across the country were left in the dark as a car advert was screened at the moment Gerrard put England ahead against main group rivals, the United States.

World Cup “Firsts”

Africa’s hosting of the World Cup join’s it to world firsts

Africa’s hosting of tournament joins the World Cup firsts.

Have you thought of this – that the ongoing 2010 Fifa World Cup in South Africa is the first on African soil?

But there have been other firsts. For instance the, first French player to be red-carded in World Cup finals was Zinedine Zidane, during their first round match against Saudi Arabia in France in 1998 – the first French to be so punished in 68 years then!

“Zizou” was red-carded again in the 2006 World Cup after a spectacular head butt on Italy center-back Marco Materazzi.

The most famous jersey is 10, which has been worn by the best footballers: Pele, Maradona, Kaka.

Numbers were first used on player’s jerseys in the 1938 France World Cup but players didn’t have the mood for swapping jerseys until 1950 when they started smelling each other’s sweat “scents”

Funny, referees never showed cards to players, the first yellow having been flashed against Russia’s Evgeny Lovchev in the opener against hosts Mexico in 1970. Also substitutes were first used then. Before then only injured players were replaced.

Traditionally, World Cup winners used to open the tournament, a tradition kept until 2006 when Germany took on Costa Rica, instead of Brazil, then the world champions.

Valdemar de Brito was the first player to miss a World Cup penalty, in Brazils 3-1 loss to Spain in Italy in 1934

Sri Lanka made history during the 1978 Argentina World Cup when it became the first country to withdraw from the tournament – because of inability to pay entry fees!

Haiti’s Ernest Jean Joseph (1974 West Germany World Cup), Scotland’s Willie Johnstone  (1978), and Diego Maradona (Mexico 1986) have been banned for failing drug tests since testing was made mandatory at England’s 1966 World Cup.

The first own-goal agony befell Ernst Loertscher of Switzerland, against West Germany in 1938. When Colombia defender Andres Escobar repeated the same mistake in USA, 1994, he was murdered two weeks after returning home.

The first country to be eliminated by toss of coin in qualifying round was Spain, losing to Turkey after a 2-2 tie in a playoff in 1954.

And at Mexico (1986) Paraguayan coach Cayetano became the first coach to be sent off, during the Belgium versus Paraguay match.

Was there any other World Cup “first”?


FIFA WORLD CUP 2010

Fifa World Cup 2010 has many lessons for Africa and the world.

Cup has many lessons for Africa and the world.

Indeed there are many lessons to Africa and the world in this 2010 world cup. It is the first on African soil. It is also probably the most colourful. We should not also forget the deafening blast of vuvuzela, a word which originated from IsiZulu – meaning noise.

It is the first time the biggest sporting event in the world being staged on African soil. South Africa has thus done the continent proud, considering that the preparations were characterised by doubts of if an African country could really host a tournament of this magnitude.

Fifa president was right in a recent speech when he said : “football is not just about the game; it is about connecting people”.

This was the case when tens of thousands of people from different cultures across the world thronged Soweto’s Orlando Stadium for a fans’ festival and concert performed by several international and local artistes.

It was a star-studded affair – with such top musicians as Black Eyed Peas, Shakira and Alicia Keys performed. The beat and sound of the drum, a musical instrument that symbolises Africa, was magical as some of Africa’s top artistes like Hugh Masekela and Angelique Kidjo sung for the continent.

A HOST OF WORLD LEADERS, INCLUDING U.S. Vice president Joe Bidden attending the opening ceremony, showed great support and goodwill for South Africa from across the continent and the world has for Africa.

On the pitch, the African players have shown great talent. This depth of talent has produced great players that dazzle the world, such as Cote d’Ivoire’s Didier Drogba of Chelsea in England and Cameroonian Samuel Etoo of Inter Milan in Italy.

Although the world cup is not over yet, the African teams have shown great performances, which I hope, will make FIFA consider increasing the number of teams from the continent to participate in the future world cups.

Last but not least, the world cup should also give Africa some positive image abroad. In the past, focus was only on the continent in relation to conflicts, famine and diseases. However, this tournament should help in showing the world our rich cultural heritage, great hospitality and natural resources.

We salute South Africa for hosting the World Cup on behalf of Africa!

2010 World Cup Soccer – Maradona as a Coach

Maradona, the coach of Argentina soccer team has inched closer to running naked in the streets of Buenos Aires..

Will Maradona Really Run Naked?

Maradona, the Coach of the Argentina soccer team has inched closer to running naked in the streets of Buenos Aires after winning their first two world cup matches.

The so called ‘ controversial ‘ Maradona has promised to run naked in the streets of Buenos Aires if Argentina wins the world cup. He said this in a pre-world cup radio interview.

I really don’t see Maradona as a controversial person, I see him as a responsible and serious coach who is determined to see his team excel.  May be those seeing him as controversial are only seeing his immediate past. If that is the case, then I think they are being unfair to him.

The former world cup superstar has so far attracted more attention from most Journalists.  He has been more in focus here than the Argentina footballer of the year, Lionel Messi or Diego Milito who handed Inter Millan victory in the UEFA champions league last month.

During the opening match of Argentina, the soccer legend turned out in immaculate gray suit and tie. Maradona traditionally sports tracksuit on the bench as a coach.

Dear Old Phone Booths

 

A telephone booth with smashed tempered glass ...
A telephone booth with smashed tempered glass in Holloway, London. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Nostalgia as phone booths make last call

Mobile phones win the war as Telecommunication Company recalls the last of its ‘call boxes’

The famous telephone booths, once a landmark in streets all over the world are taking their last calls gradually. In the next one year or so, the last of the booths will disappear from Kenyan streets.

With their exit – the war between the majestic red, yellow and (recently) cream booths, and the mobile phone, finally comes to an end, obviously won by the wireless. This process which may have happened years ago in developed countries, is happening now in most parts of Africa. Why? Pace of development.

However, as history goes, the first coin operated telephone booths were installed at Hartford Bank in Connecticut, in 1889. The English had their coin operated telephones in the early 1900’s at the Ludgate Circus Post Office.

But in the part of the world I live, in Kenya, the phone booths made their entry in 1960’s. So what will the people remember about them?

In those days, one had to go through the notorious eavesdroppers, called telephone operators. They were the demi gods of telephony then – all calls had to go through them. There was nothing like direct calls. First you call the operator and gave him/her the number you want, then replace the receiver and wait for your call. When the call comes, you hear this, ” Please insert coins into the slot to start talking”. The invincible operator would from time to time growl: “add more coins and hurry it up”. Then the worst experience follows, the operator was always the silent listener to every conversation!

The queues, and the desperate search for coins were the first headache one experienced. The phones in the booths used the silvery one-shilling coins. To ensure that your call did not end prematurely, one needed coins in plenty. So where do you get the coins from? Of course sweet and cigarette vendors had plenty of loose change. One had to buy a sweet for a shilling and give the vendor a larger denomination.

The most frustrating part of all these is that when one accidentally comes across a telephone booth where the telephone is probably out of order, and quickly ‘swallow’ the coins lined on the slot, even before you could say “hallow”. Scenes of frustrated callers angrily banging the phone’s coin slots were very common and very amusing.

The crooks were not left behind. I mean those who would do anything to break a law. They would try to use any unorthodox means to make free calls, from inserting any round object the size of the silvery coin – and even inserting tea spoons in the slots to make the machines work. Others would ask the telephone operators for the infamous “reverse calls”, this was a call to be paid for by the person receiving the call, on condition that he agrees and gives the operator a go-ahead. The “reverse call” was the closest version of the present “please call me”.

There was another trick though, which was commonly used by students or teenagers, it worked as follows – one simply lifted the handset, and “tapped” the protruding switch which cuts off the telephone when the receiver is placed on the phone. The tapping had to be as fast as possible, and the number of times must correspond with each individual number which makes the telephone number you are calling. For example if the number you want to call was 9112, one had to tap nine times very fast, with a small pause then followed by one tap and so on until the last number. And voila! The call would go through most of the time.

Today’s teenagers may not understand the agony of calling a sweetheart in those days. You had to have a thick skin; whether you liked it or not, someone was bound to overhear the conversation. A deliberate arrangement that usually involved strict timing to have the sweetheart wait at a booth on the other end.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Marginalised People of Kibra


Hi, friends

This is one of my first articles in this blog.
When starting anything new, it takes bit of time and practice. I know
how I feel – overwhelmed and frustrated, but with a lot of support and
help from new friends in this business, I have a hope that it is not
going to be as scary or as difficult.
When climbing a mountain you need to step up one step at a time. You
can’t suddenly be at the top by thought alone. You may run to get there
quicker – but you have more chance of stumbling on the way – mind you
had to learn how to walk first before you could run.
So after saying all these, I start my story:


Slum!
Have you ever seen a slum – or lived in one. Well as for myself, I
happen to be born in a slum area – brought up there, and started my
schooling there.
To understand the agony of all these, let us look in our encyclopedia
for the meaning of the word slum. I chose to look in Wikipedia – the
free encyclopedia, which says – ‘ a slum as defined by the United
Nations agency UN- HABITAT, is a rundown area of a city characterized
by substandard housing and squalor, and lacking in tenure security. The
meaning fits very well with the area I am about to describe – Kibra.

Kibra
Kibra is a village on the outskirts of Nairobi – the capitol city of
Kenya. It is situated approximately 12 kilometers on the west side of
the city center. Kibra slum is considered to be the second largest slum
in Africa , and third largest in the world. The area of Kibra
originally was about 4000 acres. This piece of land was a reward given
to the Nubian soldiers as an appreciation of their service in the army.
This story is not only about the slum – but the historical injustices
connected with the land.
The first settlers in Kibra were Nubians who were settled there by the
British in the late 1800’s or early 1900’s.

Citing the United NationsCommission of Human Rights ( UNHCR ), the community now living in Kibra are descendants of the Sudanese soldiers forcibly conscripted by the British in the 1800’s.

Nubian population.
Kenya has an estimated 100000 of these stateless people from the Nubian
ethnic community. This is according to the latest human right report
released by the US state department.


Kibra land row.
The land and Nubians living in Kibra are so historically, intricately intertwined that no amount of effort to downplay or ignore the row would end it.


Attempts to separate the two have always targeted turmoil and
volatility over the last decade or so. This state of affairs survived
the last century, and chances are that the status quo is likely to
remain for a long time to come as the security of tenure needs are not
fulfilled.
The then heavily forested area of 4197.9 acres on the outskirts of
Nairobi – the capitol city of Kenya, was allocated the Nubians of the
then Kings African Rifles and their descendants in 1904, surveyed in
1917 and formally gazetted in 1918.
The beneficiaries immediately named the area ‘Kibra’, meaning in their
language ‘jungle infested by wild animals, as this area was part of the
larger Nairobi National Park.
The Nubians then created sub localities, (villages) like Makina, Lomle
etc. which they developed according to their needs, and under the
control of the colonial administrators.


The military handed over the administration to the civilian in 1928.
The colonial administrators left a legacy in form of a school they had
built in the heart of KIbra, which was opened by the then Governor of
Kenya – Sir Evelyn Baring, in 1953, (it is in this school where the
writer of this document received his first primary education).


A memorial plaque the governor unveiled during the function is still
there to this day. It bears the inscription: ‘This building
commemorates the gift of 2000 British pound from the Army Benevolent
Fund in grateful memory of the gallant and loyal service rendered by
the Sudanese soldiers who died for the couse of Eastern Africa in the
two world wars and whose descendant s will be taught in this school’


From the outset, Nubians formed close-knit family units based on
decency – they upheld strong values about hard work, perseverance,
honesty, integrity, respect for one another and good neighborliness.
It was the community cardinal understanding through specially
constituted group of elders, to ensure good and fair social order
prevailed and that the young were brought up practicing the values.


A typical Nubian homestead at the time consisted of a hut, few cattles
and a small farm – as prescribed and controlled by the local
administration. The environment was thus conducive to economic
development – practicing and maintaining the cultural heritage, and
preserving social activities such as weddings, burial, education,
sports and other forms of entertainment.


The Nubian then integrated freely with the other tribes in the
neighborhood – notably the Kikuyus, through trade and cultural
exchange.
The Nubians were part of the development of Nairobi as a city. Self
employment at their village level provided essential retail goods and
services such as shops, hawking of fruits and vegetables.

In the years that followed, the Nubians gradually reduced ties with the British and moved towards sharing a common vision and goals with fellow Kenyans. As the struggle for independence gathered momentum in 1950’s and peaked in 1960’s, Nubians readily associated themselves with the nationalists political parties.

In the meantime the Nubians became more vocal in their demanding security of tenure for the Kibra land. This demand is still not met – but the momentum and the drive for the pursuit of the cause has not diminished one bit.

The scramble for the rapidly diminishing open land area show the shortcomings resulting from poor planning, deliberate lack of control by those in authority, and exploitation of weaknesses in land policies or lack of them. Nubians seem to bear the brunt of the unguided competition.

The unending disturbances in Kibra have their roots in the unresolved land question in the face of relentless competition brought about by uncontrolled urban migration in search of employment and affordable accommodation.

The influx has been brought about mainly by politicians who wish to settle potential voters on what they refer to as government land – which implies that there is no control as to who is eligible for settlement. This resulted in a free-for-all and survival of the fittest.

The migration was minimal in the 1960’s when the Nubian community had a representative in the government as area councilor, then as a member of parliament.

When the Nubian member of parliament was replaced with a non-Nubian, in 1975, the area started seeing a serious wave of migration into the area.
The inflow of non-Nubians did not reduce even with the entry of Mr. Philip Leakey – a Kenyan of British origin as the member of parliament for Kibra in 1980’s.

 

To the Nubians, Mr. Raila Odinga’s political entry in 1990’s (member of parliament from a dominating tribe), further increased the influx in the area. The numbers had grown probably almost exponentially.

The wave had the chilling effect of numerical domination of the area by different groups of non-Nubians – signaling the nudging of the Nubians to the periphery.

The reality now is that there is no more land area left to accommodate more immigration into Kibra. The land is badly congested and therefore the third largest slum in the world. The area is becoming increasingly  difficult to government to control.

At the start of the settlement, the ratio of non-Nubians to Nubians was 1:4, but by the 1970’s and 1980’s, the Nubian numerical advantage had been reversed – and the newcomers outnumbered them by 2:1. It is therefore not surprising that today it is estimated that the Nubians are in the minority in the ratio of 12:1.

In the current seemingly ethnicity based political order in Kenya, what chance do Nubian have for representation other than through nomination as a minority group where lobbying rules are undefined.

During the colonial time, the the administration major role was to control settlement in Kibra by issuing permits to enter the area, and providing security. This power was used to maintain a balance between the available economic resources and the population – which they could comfortably sustain without compromising security and social order.

After independence the administration gradually lost control because of pressure from the growing new political posturing and administration officials personal commercial interests.

Today it is not a secret that a significant number of uncontrolled housing structures in Kibra are owned by former provincial administration officials who, together with vested interests, also dominate businesses. Thus the original homestead configuration enjoyed by the Nubians have disappeared.

The government nobble objective soon after independence was to provide affordable housing in keeping with better urban planning and avoiding the mushrooming of uncontrolled structures.

Today, six estates have been built in the Nubian land between 1963 and 1977. Although it was expected that the people to benefit from the new estates would be Nubians – the reality was different. Through the combination of skewed allocation and prohibitive eligibility criteria, mostly financial, most deserving Nubians who had lost their villages were locked out. They were constrained to join the scramble for housing in the growing slum.

If you find this article interesting, please consider making donation to help support me in the lone journey I am making advocating for reforms of the marginalized minority. Donation will help me with my blogging expenses. Thank you.

 

[contact-form-7 id=”663″ title=”Contact form 1_copy”]